1,069 research outputs found

    Toward in vitro fertilization in Brachiaria spp.

    Get PDF
    Brachiaria are forage grasses widely cultivated in tropical areas. In vitro pollination was applied to accessions of Brachiaria spp. by placing pollen of non-dehiscent anthers on a solid medium near isolated ovaries. Viability and in vitro germination were tested in order to establish good conditions for pollen development. Comparing sexual to apomictic plants, apomictic pollen has more abortion after meiosis during the microspore stage and a lower viability and, of both types, only some plants have sufficient germination in a high sugar concentration. Using in vitro pollination with the sexual plant, the pollen tube penetrates into the nucellus and micropyle, but the embryo sac degenerates and collapses. In the apomictic B. decumbens, in vitro pollination leads to the transfer of the sperm nuclei into the egg cell and the central cell. The results are discussed according to normal fertilization and barriers in sexual and apomictic plants

    40S ribosome biogenesis co-factors are essential for gametophyte and embryo development

    Get PDF
    Ribosome biogenesis is well described in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In contrast only very little information is available on this pathway in plants. This study presents the characterization of five putative protein co-factors of ribosome biogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana, namely Rrp5, Pwp2, Nob1, Enp1 and Noc4. The characterization of the proteins in respect to localization, enzymatic activity and association with pre-ribosomal complexes is shown. Additionally, analyses of T-DNA insertion mutants aimed to reveal an involvement of the plant co-factors in ribosome biogenesis. The investigated proteins localize mainly to the nucleolus or the nucleus, and atEnp1 and atNob1 co-migrate with 40S pre-ribosomal complexes. The analysis of T-DNA insertion lines revealed that all proteins are essential in Arabidopsis thaliana and mutant plants show alterations of rRNA intermediate abundance already in the heterozygous state. The most significant alteration was observed in the NOB1 T-DNA insertion line where the P-A3 fragment, a 23S-like rRNA precursor, accumulated. The transmission of the T-DNA through the male and female gametophyte was strongly inhibited indicating a high importance of ribosome co-factor genes in the haploid stages of plant development. Additionally impaired embryogenesis was observed in some mutant plant lines. All results support an involvement of the analyzed proteins in ribosome biogenesis but differences in rRNA processing, gametophyte and embryo development suggested an alternative regulation in plants

    Functional analysis of CDKA;1, the Arabidopsis thaliana homologue of the p34cdc2 protein kinase

    Get PDF
    CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASEs (CDKs) are the central gatekeepers of cell cycle progression and conserved in all eukaryotes. In this study, the Arabidopsis thaliana master cell cycle regulator CDKA;1 was functionally analyzed. CDKA;1 is a single gene in Arabidopsis and homologous to the human Cdk1 and the yeast cdc2/CDC28. Screening of two T-DNA insertion mutant collections resulted in the isolation of two independent cdka;1 null mutant alleles, which displayed the same phenotype. CDKA;1 was found to be required for both the sporophytic and the male gametophytic generations of the flowering plant Arabidopsis. While during sporophyte development, heterozygous mutant plants were unaffected, homozygous cdka;1 mutants were not viable and died as young embryos. During male gametophyte (pollen) development, the lack of CDKA;1 function caused a cell cycle arrest in the G2 phase prior to the last mitotic division. This cell cycle defect led to cdka;1 mutant pollen with only one instead of the usual two sperm cells. Nevertheless, the mutant cdka;1 pollen was viable and could fertilize the female gametophyte (embryo sac). Because cdka;1 pollen grains had only one instead of two sperm cells, they only performed single fertilization and thus, disrupted the double fertilization event characteristic of flowering plants. Interestingly, the cdka;1 mutant single fertilization exclusively targeted the egg cell, leaving the progenitor of the endosperm, the central cell, unfertilized. However, upon cdka;1 fertilization of the egg cell, not only the embryo started to develop, but the unfertilized central cell nucleus also began to divide. This onset of endosperm development without fertilization revealed a hitherto unrecognized endosperm proliferation signal emitted from the fertilization of the egg cell. The autonomous endosperm in cdka;1-fertilized seeds only underwent up to five nuclear division cycles before it stopped proliferating, followed by an early abortion of the whole seed. Thus, the cdka;1 mutant belongs to a rare class of paternal effect mutants that cause seed abortion irrespective of the genetic constitution of the female partner. In order to enhance endosperm proliferation in cdka;1-fertilized seeds, cdka;1 pollen was crossed to various fis-class mutants. These mutants are defective in the maternally inherited FIS-complex, a Polycomb-group repressive complex controlling genomic imprinting in the endosperm. In fis-class mutants, autonomous endosperm develops in the absence of fertilization. When fertilized, the fis-class mutant endosperm over-proliferates and due to a maternal effect these seeds abort later during development. The endosperm development in cdka;1-fertilized fis-mutant seeds was substantially enhanced and led to a partial rescue of the cdka;1-mediated seed abortion. Unexpectedly, the maternally conferred seed abortion caused by fis-class mutants was also partially reversed, producing viable seeds among the fis-class x cdka;1 offspring. This rescue was characterized by a down-regulated expression of the MADS-box transcription factor PHERES1, a downstream target of FIS-complex repression which is highly over-expressed in fertilized fis-class mutants. The down-regulation of PHERES1 in fis-class x cdka;1 endosperm suggests that the lack of paternal expression in combination with the defective gene repression of fis-class mutants results in a more balanced gene dosage of PHERES1 and potentially other genes of which the dosage is pivotal for regular seed development. These results indicate that the FIS-complex is not essential for endosperm development, but is important to harmonize maternal and paternal gene expression by the control of imprinting in the female genome. Furthermore, these data demonstrate that the paternal genome is not required for functional endosperm development if maternally derived genomic imprinting is bypassed due to mutations in the FIS-complex. The finding that a solely maternally derived endosperm can sustain seed development supports a hypothesis raised by Eduard Strasburger, who proposed in 1900 that the endosperm of flowering plants is of female gametophytic origin and that central cell fertilization might have evolved as a trigger to start endosperm proliferation

    Evidence for a role of Arabidopsis CDT1 proteins in gametophyte development and maintenance of genome integrity

    Get PDF
    Meristems retain the ability to divide throughout the life cycle of plants, which can last for over 1000 years in some species. Furthermore, the germline is not laid down early during embryogenesis but originates from the meristematic cells relatively late during development. Thus, accurate cell cycle regulation is of utmost importance to avoid the accumulation of mutations during vegetative growth and reproduction. The Arabidopsis thaliana genome encodes two homologs of the replication licensing factor CDC10 Target1 (CDT1), and overexpression of CDT1a stimulates DNA replication. Here, we have investigated the respective functions of Arabidopsis CDT1a and CDT1b. We show that CDT1 proteins have partially redundant functions during gametophyte development and are required for the maintenance of genome integrity. Furthermore, CDT1-RNAi plants show endogenous DNA stress, are more tolerant than the wild type to DNA-damaging agents, and show constitutive induction of genes involved in DNA repair. This DNA stress response may be a direct consequence of reduced CDT1 accumulation on DNA repair or may relate to the ability of CDT1 proteins to form complexes with DNA polymerase e, which functions in DNA replication and in DNA stress checkpoint activation. Taken together, our results provide evidence for a crucial role of Arabidopsis CDT1 proteins in genome stability

    ์• ๊ธฐ์žฅ๋Œ€ DEMETER ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ์ „์‚ฌ ์กฐ์ ˆ๊ณผ DNA demethylase ์ƒ๋™์œ ์ „์ž๊ตฐ์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์ž์—ฐ๊ณผํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ƒ๋ช…๊ณผํ•™๋ถ€,2020. 2. ์ตœ์—ฐํฌ.The DEMETER (DME) DNA glycosylase initiates active DNA demethylation via the base-excision repair pathway and is vital for reproduction in Arabidopsis thaliana. DME-mediated DNA demethylation is preferentially targeted to small, AT-rich, and nucleosome-depleted euchromatic transposable elements, influencing expression of adjacent genes and leading to imprinting in the endosperm. In the female gametophyte, DME expression and subsequent genome-wide DNA demethylation is confined to the companion cell of the egg, the central cell. Here, I show that in the male gametophyte, DME expression is limited to the companion cell of sperm, the vegetative cell, and to a narrow window of time; immediately following separation of the companion cell lineage from the germline. I define transcriptional regulatory elements of DME using reporter genes, showing that a small region within the DME gene controls its expression in male and female companion cells. DME expression from this minimal promoter is sufficient to rescue seed abortion and the aberrant DNA methylome associated with the null dme-2 mutation. Within this minimal promoter, I found short, conserved enhancer sequences necessary for the transcriptional activities of DME and combine predicted binding motifs with published transcription factor binding coordinates to produce a list of candidate upstream pathway members in the genetic circuitry controlling DNA demethylation in gamete companion cells. Besides I provide evidence of the minimal promoters specific binding in yeast by a BPC and an HD-ZIP transcription factor. These data show how DNA demethylation is regulated to facilitate endosperm gene imprinting and potential transgenerational epigenetic regulation, without subjecting the germline to potentially deleterious transposable element demethylation. There are several differences in dme mutant depending on mutation site and their ecotype. To identify what make the differences, I crossed mutants having different allele or ecotype. As a result of the crosses, I found a genomic region that seemed to be beneficial in overcoming seed abortion. In Arabidopsis there are three homologous genes of DME; REPRESSOR OF SILENCING1 (ROS1), DEMETER-LIKE (DML) 2 and 3. These family genes are expressed in all sporophytic tissues. To address the contribution of DNA demethylation to plant life cycle and interaction between demethylases, using crosses of mutants of DNA demethylase family, I found evidence of interaction of DNA demethylase family.DEMETER (DME) DNA glycosylase๋Š” base-excision repair pathway๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด DNA demethylation์„ ๊ฐœ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์• ๊ธฐ์žฅ๋Œ€์—์„œ์˜ ์ƒ์‹์— ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. DME-๋งค๊ฐœ DNA demethylation์€ ์งง๊ณ  AT-richํ•˜๋ฉฐ nucleosome์ด ์ ์€ euchromatic TE ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ธ์ ‘ํ•œ ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ณ  ๋ฐฐ์œ ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ๊ฐ์ธ์„ ์œ ๋„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์•”๋ฐฐ์šฐ์ฒด์—์„œ DME ๋ฐœํ˜„๊ณผ ๊ทธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ฒŒ๋†ˆ ์ „์ฒด DNA demethylation์€ ๋‚œ์ž์˜ ๋™๋ฐ˜ ์„ธํฌ์ธ ์ค‘์‹ฌ ์„ธํฌ์— ๊ตญํ•œ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋‚˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ฐฐ์šฐ์ฒด์˜ DME ๋ฐœํ˜„์€ ์ •์ž์˜ ๋™๋ฐ˜ ์„ธํฌ์ธ vegetative cell์— ์ œํ•œ๋˜๋ฉฐ ๋ฐœํ˜„ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋„ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ œํ•œ๋จ์„ ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค. ๋ฆฌํฌํ„ฐ ์œ ์ „์ž๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ DME์˜ ์ „์‚ฌ ์กฐ์ ˆ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์•˜๊ณ , DME ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ์กฐ์ ˆ ์ธ์ž๊ฐ€ ์•”์ˆ˜๋ฐฐ์šฐ์ฒด์˜ ๋™๋ฐ˜ ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์„ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ์กฐ์ ˆ ์ธ์ž๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ํ”„๋กœ๋ชจํ„ฐ์— ์˜ํ•œ DME์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์€ dme-2 ๋Œ์—ฐ๋ณ€์ด์˜ ์ข…์ž์œ ์‚ฐํ‘œํ˜„ํ˜•์„ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ณ  DME์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ DNA methylation์„ ํšŒ๋ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ์— ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ด ์ตœ์†Œ ํ”„๋กœ๋ชจํ„ฐ์—์„œ ๋‚˜๋Š” DME์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ enhancer ์„œ์—ด์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ณต๊ฐœ๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ด ๋ชจํ‹ฐํ”„์— ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ›„๋ณด ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ๋“ค์˜ ๋ชฉ๋ก์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ yeast 2 hybrid ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ”„๋กœ๋ชจํ„ฐ์˜ ์ „์‚ฌ ์กฐ์ ˆ ์ธ์ž์— BPC์™€ HD-ZIP ์ „์‚ฌ ์ธ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” DNA demethylation์ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์กฐ์ ˆ๋˜์–ด ์œ ์ „์ž๊ฐ์ธ์„ ์œ ๋„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์œ ํ•ดํ•œ ์š”์†Œ์ธ TE์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ œํ•œํ•˜๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ์•Œ๋ ค์ค€๋‹ค. ๋Œ์—ฐ๋ณ€์ด ๋ถ€์œ„์™€ ๊ทธ ์—์ฝ” ํƒ€์ž…์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ dme ๋Œ์—ฐ๋ณ€์ด ์ฒด์—๋Š” ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฐจ์ด์ ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ฐจ์ด์ ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์—์ฝ” ํƒ€์ž…์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋Œ์—ฐ๋ณ€์ด์ฒด๋ฅผ ๊ต๋ฐฐ ์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ๊ต๋ฐฐ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋‚˜๋Š” ์ข…์ž ์œ ์‚ฐํ‘œํ˜„ํ˜•์„ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒŒ๋†ˆ ์˜์—ญ์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์• ๊ธฐ ์žฅ๋Œ€์—๋Š” DME์˜ homologue๊ฐ€ 3 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์กด์žฌํ•œ๋‹ค. REPRESSOR OF SILENCING1 (ROS1), DEMETER-LIKE (DML) 2 ๋†” 3์ด ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. DNA demethylation์ด ์‹๋ฌผ ์ƒ์• ์ฃผ๊ธฐ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ณผ demethylase ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ์•Œ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, DNA demethylase๋“ค์˜ ๋Œ์—ฐ๋ณ€์ด ์ฒด์˜ ๊ต๋ฐฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๊ณ  ๊ทธ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด DNA homologue ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์˜ ์ฆ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.1. CHAPTER I. CONTROL OF DEMETER DNA DEMETHYLASE GENE TRANSCRIPTION IN MALE AND FEMALE GAMETE COMPANION CELLS IN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA ๏ผ‘ 1.1 INTRODUCTION ๏ผ’ 1.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ๏ผ— 1.2.1. Plant materials and growth conditions ๏ผ— 1.2.2. Recombinant Plasmid Construction ๏ผ— 1.2.3. Histochemical GUS Staining, GFP fluorescence and Microscopy ๏ผ˜ 1.2.4. Gene expression analysis ๏ผ™ 1.2.5. Identification of DME Regulatory Regions โ€“ TUO vector series ๏ผ‘๏ผ 1.2.6. Identification of DME Regulatory Regions โ€“ Element deletion ๏ผ‘๏ผ‘ 1.2.7. Identification of DME Regulatory Regions โ€“ Element substitution ๏ผ‘๏ผ‘ 1.2.8. Yeast one-hybrid assay ๏ผ‘๏ผ‘ 1.2.9. 5 Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5 RACE) analysis ๏ผ‘๏ผ’ 1.2.10. Bisulfite sequencing library construction. ๏ผ‘๏ผ’ 1.3. RESULTS ๏ผ‘8 1.3.1. DME is Expressed Specifically in the Companion Cell of the Male Gametophyte after Separation of the Sperm Cell Lineage. ๏ผ‘8 1.3.2. The DME Promoter Lies within the DME Transcriptional Unit and Contains Both Positive and Negative Regulatory Elements. ๏ผ’4 1.3.3. Expressing DME Polypeptide in the Central Cell with a Minimal Reproductive Promoter Rescues Seed Abortion and Aberrant DNA methylation associated with the dme-2 mutation. ๏ผ“4 1.3.4. A 357 bp Region of the DME Transcriptional Unit is both Necessary and Sufficient to Generate the Appropriate DME Expression Profile during Female Gametophyte Development. ๏ผ”8 1.3.5. DME Expression in Sporophytic Tissues Is Regulated by Distinct DNA Sequences. ๏ผ•7 1.3.6. Sequence Substitution Inside the SPE Region Abolishes Sporophytic Expression, and Binds the BPC3 Transcription Factor ๏ผ–4 1.3.7. Overlapping 15 and 47 Base Pair Regions Are Necessary for DME Expression in the Central and Vegetative Cells, Respectively. ๏ผ–9 1.3.8. The 15 bp CCE Sequence, Shared by the VCE, Is Required for DME Expression and Is Predicted to Bind Several Key Transcription Factors. 72 1.4. DISCUSSION ๏ผ—9 2. CHAPTER II. INTERACTION BETWEEN DNA DEMETHYLASE FAMILY MEMBERS IN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA ๏ผ˜8 2.1 INTRODUCTION ๏ผ˜9 2.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 92 2.2.1. Plant materials and growth conditions 92 2.2.2. Gene expression analysis 92 2.3 RESULTS 94 2.3.1 Strong allele dme-2 homozygous mutants are able to be generate by cross with weak allele dme-1 mutants. 94 2.3.2. Backcrossing of Ler dme-2 homozygous mutant with Col-gl dme-2 heterozygous mutant is not able to eliminate Ler genome. 103 2.3.3. Mutant allele of DNA demethylase family gene can rescue dme-mediated seed abortion partially, and abolish the rescue 111 2.3.4. It is altered that interaction of ros1-3, dml2-1 and dml3-1 in +46 cDME; dme-2 Col background ๏ผ‘25 2.4 DISCUSSION 133 3. REFERENCES 140 4. ABSTRACT IN KOREAN ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 148Docto

    ์• ๊ธฐ์žฅ๋Œ€์—์„œ DEMETER์™€ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ธ์ž์˜ ์„ ๋ณ„

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์ž์—ฐ๊ณผํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ƒ๋ช…๊ณผํ•™๋ถ€,2019. 8. ์ตœ์—ฐํฌ.DNA methylation and demethylation plays significant roles in regulating gene expression on variable stress reactions and TEs silencing. A DEMETER (DME), an active DNA demethylase in plants, is expressed in the central cell of the female gametophyte in Arabidopsis required for seed development and has glycosylase activity that can actively remove 5-mC that is replaced by cytosine via base excision pathway. DME induces maternal allele expression of the imprinted MEDEA (MEA) polycomb gene and the DNA glycosylase activity of DME leads to the DNA demethylation on its targets. In plants, there is no massive methylation reprogramming in embryo like mammal but instead, the companion cells whose DNA contents are not inherited to the next generation go through global demethylation and the hypomethylated state is maintained in late endosperm stage in which DME is no longer expressed. Despite all these distinct significances, little is known about the interactors that associate with DME. Here, to identify the interacting partners of DME, I used Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC). From 83 genes that have been confirmed by the Yeast Two-Hybrid system that interact with DME, I primarily chose 18 candidates to test interaction. While examining these 18 candidates by BiFC, AT5G37930, AT5G60980, AT1G70620, AT5G23090 and the C terminal part of AT1G20960 showed fluorescent signals when it was co-transfected with DME in Arabidopsis Col-0 protoplasts. These interactors contain either E3-ubiquitin ligase activity, RNA binding motif, homologous feature of transcription factor which is related to histone acetylation, or are related to RNA splicing. To further understand its relation with DME in plants one candidate, At1g20960 that is related to RNA splicing, was chosen and its mutant was crossed with dme mutant for phenotyping analyses. dme mutant allele transmission, segregation and seed abortion ratio shown in dme single mutant were not changed in double mutants. Therefore, by doing further experiments, using different candidates, this study would give some specific and clear perspectives and contribute to widen the knowledge by identifying a novel protein involved in the DME demethylation pathway in plants.DNA์˜ ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”์™€ ๋””๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”๋Š” ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ๋ฌผ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ง๋ฉดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค ์ƒํ™ฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ „์ด ์ธ์ž์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์„ ์–ต์ œํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฑ์˜ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. DEMETER(DME)๋Š” ์‹๋ฌผ์—์„œ ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” DNA ๊ธ€๋ฆฌ์ฝ”์‹คํ™” ํšจ์†Œ๋กœ ์• ๊ธฐ์žฅ๋Œ€ ์•”๋ฐฐ์šฐ์ฒด์˜ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ ๋ฐœํ˜„ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ข…์ž์˜ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ์— ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. DME๋Š” ์—ผ๊ธฐ์ ˆ์ œํšŒ๋ณต๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ํ†ตํ•ด 5-mC๋ฅผ ์ง์ ‘ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹œํ† ์‹ ์œผ๋กœ ์น˜ํ™˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ๋””๋ฉ”ํ‹ธํ™”๋ฅผ ๋งค๊ฐœํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‹๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ฐฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ํฌ์œ ๋™๋ฌผ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฆฌํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐ์ด ์ผ์–ด๋‚˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๋Œ€์‹  ๋‹ค์Œ ์„ธ๋Œ€๋กœ ์œ ์ „ ์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ์ „๋‹ฌ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์ƒ์‹์„ธํฌ๋‚˜ ๋ฐฐ์˜ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๋””๋ฉ”ํ‹ธ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์ด ์ผ์–ด๋‚˜๊ณ  ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ•˜์ดํฌ๋ฉ”ํ‹ธ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์ƒํƒœ๊ฐ€ DME๊ฐ€ ๋” ์ด์ƒ ๋ฐœํ˜„ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ํ›„๊ธฐ ๋ฐฐ์ฃผ๊นŒ์ง€ ์œ ์ง€๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  DME์˜ ๋””๋ฉ”ํ‹ธ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ DME์™€ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ธ์ž๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋งŽ์ด ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๋ฐ”๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” DME์™€ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ธ์ž๋“ค์„ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋ถ„์žํ˜•๊ด‘์ƒ๋ณด๊ธฐ๋ฒ•(Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํšจ๋ชจ์ด์ค‘์žก์ข…ํ™”(Yeast Two-Hybrid)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์„ ํ–‰์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐํ˜€์ง„ DME์™€ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” 83๊ฐœ์˜ ์œ ์ „์ž ์ค‘ 18๊ฐœ์˜ ํ›„๋ณด ์œ ์ „์ž๋ฅผ ์šฐ์„ ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ๊ทธ ์ค‘ AT5G37930, AT5G60980, AT1G70620, AT5G23090, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  AT1G20960์˜ C ๋ง๋‹จ๋ถ€๊ฐ€ ์• ๊ธฐ์žฅ๋Œ€ ์•ผ์ƒ์ข…(Col-0)์˜ ์›ํ˜•์งˆ์ฒด์— DME์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ํŠธ๋žœ์ŠคํŽ™์…˜๋˜์—ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์œ ์ „์ž๋“ค์€ E3 ์œ ๋น„ํ€ดํ‹ด ๋ผ์ด๊ฒŒ์ด์ฆˆ ํ™œ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ RNA ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ๋ชจํ‹ฐ๋ธŒ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋ฉฐ ํžˆ์Šคํ†ค ์•„์„ธํ‹ธ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋œ ์ „์‚ฌ์ธ์ž์˜ ์ƒ๋™ ์œ ์ „์ž๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ถ„์žํ˜•๊ด‘์ƒ๋ณด๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐํ˜€์ง„ ์œ ์ „์ž๋“ค๊ณผ DME์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด RNA ์Šคํ”Œ๋ผ์ด์‹ฑ์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” Brr2a๋ฅผ ์•”ํ˜ธํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ์ „์ž์ธ At1g20960์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ์—ฐ๋ณ€์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. At1g20960์˜ T-DNA ์‚ฝ์ž… ๋Œ์—ฐ๋ณ€์ด์ฒด์ธ emb1507-1 ์‹๋ฌผ์ฒด๋ฅผ ยฌdme-2 ๋Œ์—ฐ๋ณ€์ด์ฒด์™€ ๊ต๋ฐฐํ•˜์—ฌ ์–ป์€ ์ด์ค‘์ดํ˜•์ ‘ํ•ฉ ๋Œ์—ฐ๋ณ€์ด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ข…์ž์˜ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ๋‹จ๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ์ข…์ž์œ ์‚ฐ ์—ฌ๋ถ€์™€ ๋Œ์—ฐ๋ณ€์ด ๋Œ€๋ฆฝ์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋น„, ํŠธ๋žœ์Šค๋ฏธ์…˜์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ˜•์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ dme-2 ๋‹จ์ผ ์ดํ˜•์ ‘ํ•ฉ๋Œ์—ฐ๋ณ€์ด์ฒด์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ํ•ด๋‹น ํ‘œํ˜„ํ˜•๋“ค์—์„œ์˜ ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ• ๋งŒํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•  ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์‹๋ฌผ์—์„œ DME์˜ ๋””๋ฉ”ํ‹ธ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ณผ์ •์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ธ์ž๋ฅผ ๋ฐํ˜€๋ƒ„์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ถ„์ž์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ์˜ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ˜• ๋ถ„์„์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ At1g20960 ์™ธ์— ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ ํ›„๋ณด ์œ ์ „์ž๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์—ญ์‹œ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค.ABSTRACT โ…ฐ TABLES OF CONTENTS โ…ฒ LIST OF FIGURES โ…ด LIST OF TABLES โ…ต BACKGROUNDS 1 1. DNA Methylation in Arabidopsis 1 2. DNA demethylation and DEMETER 4 3. Purpose of this Study 7 CHAPTER ONE: Interaction Partner Screening for DEMETER using Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation(BiFC) Assay 8 1. Introduction 9 2. Materials and methods 12 2.1. Plant material and growth conditions 12 2.2. Previous yeast two-hybrid data 12 2.3. List-up for BiFC assay 15 2.4. Cloning for BiFC assay 15 2.5. BiFC assay 21 3. Results and discussion 23 3.1. Cloning for BiFC assay 23 3.2. 5 genes were identified as interactors of DME through BiFC 25 CHAPTER TWO: Phenotypic Study for the DME interactors 31 1. Introduction 32 2. Materials and methods 35 2.1. Plant material and growth conditions 35 2.2. Seed-set analysis and whole-mount clearing 35 3. Results and discussion 38 3.1. EMB/emb1507-1 seed phenotype 38 3.2. EMB/emb1507-1;DME/dme-2 double heterozygote mutant seed phenotype 38 3.3. Transmission of emb and dme alleles in EMB/emb1507-1;DME/dme-2 mutant plants 41 CONCLUSION 43 REFERENCE 46 ABSTRACT IN KOREAN 52Maste

    Genetic and cytological analyses of four partial-sterile mutants in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)

    Get PDF
    Four partial-sterile soybean mutants recovered from a transposon tagging study were the subject of this research. Soybean partial-sterile mutants 1, 2, 3, and 4 (PS-1, PS-2, PS-3, and PS-4) are characterized by reduced number of seed per pods. The objectives were to study the inheritance, linkage, allelism, and reproductive biology of the PS\u27s mutants. For inheritance and linkage tests the PS\u27s mutants were crossed to Harosoy-w[subscript]4, and to chlorophyll-deficient mutants CD-1 and CD-5, also recovered from the tagging study. For allelism tests reciprocal crosses were made between PS\u27s mutants. The gene in PS-1 is a single recessive gene, which was inherited in a 3:1 ratio. The genes in PS-2, PS-3, and PS-4 were inherited in a 1:1 ratio. Reciprocal crosses made between normal plants from PS-2, PS-3, PS-4 with \u27BSR 101\u27 indicated that the PS\u27s were homozygous for normal chromosome structure. Linkage results from F[subscript]2 and F[subscript]3 generations indicated that the gene for partial sterility in the PS\u27s was not linked to the w[subscript]4 locus or to the CD-1 or CD-5 mutants. Allelism test showed that the gene in PS-1 was nonallelic to the gene in PS-2, PS-3, and PS-4. The allelism test also indicated that the gene for partial sterility in PS-2, PS-3, and PS-4 was not transmitted to the next generation when PS-2, PS-3 and PS-4 mutants were used as female parent. Results of pollen grains stained with iodine potassium iodide, differential staining, and fluorescein diacetate, from partial-sterile plants of PS\u27s mutants, indicated no difference in stainability, morphology, and fluorescence compared to pollen grains from normal plants. These results suggested that the pollen grains from PS\u27s mutants were fully viable. Megagametogenesis indicated that the ovule abortion in PS-1 mutant was due to abnormalities associated with polar nuclei/secondary endosperm nucleus. The failure of double fertilization, the absence of endosperm development and lack of nutrients in the PS-1 ovule mutant lead to early embryo abortion. PS-2, PS-3, and PS-4 had normal megagametogenesis which was identical to ovule development in normal plants. At anthesis, the embryo sac had the egg apparatus, with two synergids and egg cell, and the secondary endosperm nucleus. Thus the lack of fertilization in these mutants was probably due a specific gene already imprinted in the gametes and it was not due to failure of pollen-tube growth

    GAMETOPHYTE AND SPOROPHYTE CROSSTALK DURING FERTILIZATION IN ARABIDOPSIS

    Get PDF
    Arabidopsis thaliana seeds comprise three tissues, which are genetically and functionally distinct. However, in order to ensure a correct seed development, a communication and coordination of them is strictly necessary. The seed coat is a five-layer tissue surrounding the female gametophyte. In the stk abs double mutant only four layers form this tissue: the endothelium, the innermost one, does not differentiate. Since the endothelium is a sporophytic layer directly in contact with the gametophyte before the fertilization and with the endosperm after the fertilization, we hypothesized a possible role of this layer in the communication between those tissues. In this work, the role of the endothelium has been investigated, as well as the role of the STK and ABS, the two MADS box transcription factors required for endothelium differentiation. An additional interesting phenotype of the stk abs double mutant is the excessive amount of starch accumulating in the central cell of the female gametophyte. This might causes the partial sterility described for the double mutant. Combining stk abs with the gpt1 mutant, whose mature ovules do not accumulate starch, we found a partial recovery of the phenotype; this result support the idea that the excess of starch in the double mutant could physically prevent the correct fertilization process
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore